A tiger. A painting of a tiger. The painting is hungry, the painting is panting, passing out from hunger; partly because there is nothing to eat and that’s mainly because of bad art, it’s a very bad portrayal on a wall, of a tiger, and, well..frankly the gallery is going under, mainly because of the curator not knowing what is good art, and what art is not good. Simple. This person paid a fortune for some really bad art to hang on the wall in a gallery, with good lighting, but no entrepeneurial expertise involved, no savvy. So basically a bad painting ate a dumb business loan, the End. ~c. P-s: Smart money’s in Luxembourg